Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] TAP-plugins reverb presets (fwd)
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Sat Mar 06 2004 - 20:59:43 EET
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 05:45:03 +0100, Tim Goetze wrote:
> [Steve Harris]
> >If you look back through the archives you'l see that my attitude changed
> >form "yay, more features, cram them in" (luckily rained in by Paul and
> >Richard) to a more considered attitude.
>
> and now we all have a solid 4 years of hands-on ladspa experience
> showing what the standard lacks sorely.
>
> we all agree, it seems, on what this is, so the danger of cramming in
> features without consideration is reduced to the point of nothingness
> i think.
It doesnt look like it to me ;)
> having those extended features in a header or in RDF is an
> insignificant distinction:
>
> if we do it, we must support it in the future no matter whether it is
> written in .h or .rdf.
Yes, but the difference to new developers is huge, they must understand
everything in the .h file before thay can write a plugin or host.
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Mar 06 2004 - 21:02:31 EET