Re: Latency indication (was Re: [linux-audio-dev] +momentary, consolidated (ladspa.h.diff))

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: Latency indication (was Re: [linux-audio-dev] +momentary, consolidated (ladspa.h.diff))
From: Paul Davis (paul_AT_linuxaudiosystems.com)
Date: Mon Mar 08 2004 - 19:43:24 EET


>Yes, but we need to think carefully about the name, "_latency" or
>".latency" might be a better choice, with a note that hosts should ignore
>_/. prefixed ports that they do not understand.

i would prefer

        #define LADSPA_LATENCY_PORT_NAME "_wotever"

or something similar.


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Mar 08 2004 - 19:42:50 EET