Subject: Re: Latency indication (was Re: [linux-audio-dev] +momentary, consolidated (ladspa.h.diff))
From: Paul Davis (paul_AT_linuxaudiosystems.com)
Date: Mon Mar 08 2004 - 19:43:24 EET
>Yes, but we need to think carefully about the name, "_latency" or
>".latency" might be a better choice, with a note that hosts should ignore
>_/. prefixed ports that they do not understand.
i would prefer
#define LADSPA_LATENCY_PORT_NAME "_wotever"
or something similar.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Mar 08 2004 - 19:42:50 EET