[linux-audio-dev] Re: LADSPA extension

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: LADSPA extension
From: Alfons Adriaensen (fons.adriaensen_AT_alcatel.be)
Date: Wed Mar 10 2004 - 15:42:00 EET


On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:44:26AM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:

> But it will use up two flags that may be needed later and may clash with
> future extensions, or produce binary imcompatibility. Not to mention that
> it is effectivly a fork in LADSPA.

There are still 20 bits left. And we can reserve #31 for a version jump anyway.
And I think 1.1 -> 1.2 is not a fork, it isn't meant to be anyway.

 
> I think this is a very, very bad idea.

Do you mean the proposal, or any premature implementation ?

-- 
FA


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Mar 10 2004 - 15:41:47 EET