Re: [linux-audio-dev] RME totalyser clone ?

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] RME totalyser clone ?
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Mar 22 2004 - 16:54:04 EET


On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 04:33:57PM +0100, Cournapeau David wrote:
> >Linux is lacking efficient, high-quality standalone EQs for example.
> >
> >
> What do you mean by standalone ? Something like a jack client ? Or totally
> independant (portaudio client, etc...) What would
> be the differences compare to a LADSPA plug-in for example ?
> (advantages, disadvantages)

Yes, I was thinking of a jack client - recent versions of Port Audio
support JACK I think - the advantage over a LADSPA plugin is that you can
code the UI, whereas LADSPA plugins (currently) have no UI specification.

Large multiband EQs and parametrics really need a custom UI to be useful
IMHO. EQ was only an example though - I'm sure there are plenty of other
useful projects.
 
> Please excuse my ignorance if the above question is nonsense; I am still
> not confortable with the different 'protocols/API/format' under unix and
> GNU/linux.

- Steve


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Mar 22 2004 - 16:52:59 EET