Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: PdDSP?

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: PdDSP?
From: Cournapeau David (cournape_AT_enst.fr)
Date: Thu Apr 08 2004 - 19:19:30 EEST


Mr.Freeze wrote:

>Heya,
>
>Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
>
>
>>Sukandar Kartadinata ist working on something like this for some time
>>now. See http://glui.de/proj/gluiph.html for a general project
>>description (careful, psycedelic website!) and this PDF:
>>
>>
>
>Interesting!
>
>
>
>>You could start with the PD for PDA project, which did this, but for
>>Pd 0.32. We're now at Pd 0.37 on general purpose computers.
>>
>>
>
>I'll definitely not go for an ARM-powered expander!
>
>Let me explain the facts, what I should have done from the beginning:
>
>I'm planning to build a special controller based on the Theremin, with MIDI
>and/or CV outs. All material released for free: schematics, software...
>
>The Theremin does have a trademark sound, even if most think it's a pure sine
>wave; but the aforementionned controller won't reduce itself to this: I'm more
>interested in its sensing technology.
>
>Yet, I was wondering if an built-in expander was needed in addition, for live
>use; or if it could simply rely on a computer (my use). Hence my idea to use a
>kinda port of PureData to DSP so that the user could get the same sound either
>from hardware or software means, just by dumping patches; instead of having to
>write a separate pure C/C++ DSP source code with specific non-compliant
>patches, or even having to advice proprietary synth expander to the prospective
>users. But what I do not want to do is building myself another computer...
>
>I thought DSP-powered expanders had one big advantage over PC-based expanders:
>the lack of crashes... Trick or treat?
>
>
>
>
Well, I know almost nothing about DSP, but for sure, there is nothing to
prevent any crash. My waldorf (Q) crashed once in a week (based on
56303, as most hardware VA theses days, including nova and virus). The
thing is that generally, the system is a lot more simple on DSP based
machines, so it is simpler to 'control everything'.

But my point may be too naive !

Cheers,

David


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Apr 08 2004 - 19:17:24 EEST