Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] RFC: Disposable Soft Synth Interface
From: Robert Jonsson (robert.jonsson_AT_dataductus.se)
Date: Thu Apr 29 2004 - 13:56:29 EEST
Hi,
(cross posting to muse devel)
On Thursday 29 April 2004 11.50, Tim Goetze wrote:
> [Chris Cannam]
>
> >The header file is here:
> >
> > http://dssi.sourceforge.net/dssi.h.txt
>
> the header looks OK to me, reusing ALSA and LADSPA is a nice idea
> indeed. however i'm a bit uneasy about the configure() method of the
> plugin and its implications. a couple of points:
I have not read the proposal, I really should.. just out of interest.
Anyway, I see ALSA and LADSPA mentioned above and felt I should comment.
The softsynth interface in MusE (MusE Experimental Software Synthesizer -
M.E.S.S) used to have this layout but Werner recently changed it to a native
format.
I think (with emphasis on think, since I don't have the whole picture) that
the reason was among others that this solution does not allow for faster than
realtime execution.
I think (once again, think) MESS has QT dependencies so it would probably not
work as a neutral format but for interested people you can check it out here:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/lmuse/muse/synti/
Regards,
Robert
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Apr 29 2004 - 13:59:34 EEST