Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] RFC: Disposable Soft Synth Interface
From: Chris Cannam (cannam_AT_all-day-breakfast.com)
Date: Thu Apr 29 2004 - 14:25:18 EEST
On Thursday 29 Apr 2004 11:32 am, Tim Goetze wrote:
> hmm. agreed of course about the complicated alternatives. i wasn't
> aware that a separate plugin GUI becomes nigh mandatory, which i
> must admit i find not to my greatest liking.
Only if you actually need the configure() stuff, which many plugins
might not. But I agree it's not exactly ideal. Better ideas
welcome.
> i'm not too intimate with liblo/OSC, so sorry for asking an RTFM
> question: does OSC provide some sort of alternative, textual
> representation of configuration options?
I don't think OSC knows anything about "configuration" as such, it's
just a delivery mechanism for passing typed arguments to named
methods. Steve's really the OSC nut though: I'm just happy that it's
reasonably simple and it works.
Chris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Apr 29 2004 - 14:16:23 EEST