Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Off Topic [Fwd: Mail System Error - Returned Mail]
From: Jens M Andreasen (jens.andreasen_AT_chello.se)
Date: Sat May 01 2004 - 09:18:35 EEST
Chris!
It looks like your other mailserver subscribes to the same blacklist.
I laughfed when most of Spain got blacklisted the other week, but beeing
in that situation is no fun at all :(
I hope that the good people at chello.se will soon solve the problem.
/jens
attached mail follows:
This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
Each of the following recipients was rejected by a remote mail server.
The reasons given by the server are included to help you determine why
each recipient was rejected.
Recipient: <chris.cannam_AT_ferventsoftware.com>
Reason: Service unavailable; Client host [213.46.243.22] blocked using spamsource.ukpost.com; Site blacklisted - for more details see http://www.ukpost.com/spamsource.html
Please reply to <Postmaster_AT_chello.nl>
if you feel this message to be in error.
attached mail follows:
This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
Each of the following recipients was rejected by a remote mail server.
The reasons given by the server are included to help you determine why
each recipient was rejected.
Recipient: <cannam_AT_all-day-breakfast.com>
Reason: Service unavailable; Client host [213.46.243.22] blocked
using spamsource.ukpost.com; Site blacklisted - for more details see
http://www.ukpost.com/spamsource.html
Please reply to <Postmaster_AT_chello.nl>
if you feel this message to be in error.
attached mail follows:
This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
Each of the following recipients was rejected by a remote mail server.
The reasons given by the server are included to help you determine why
each recipient was rejected.
Recipient: <cannam_AT_all-day-breakfast.com>
Reason: Service unavailable; Client host [213.46.243.22] blocked using spamsource.ukpost.com; Site blacklisted - for more details see http://www.ukpost.com/spamsource.html
Please reply to <Postmaster_AT_chello.nl>
if you feel this message to be in error.
attached mail follows:
On tor, 2004-04-29 at 16:11, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Thursday 29 Apr 2004 2:19 pm, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
> > I think I will not be really, totally happy before I see something
> > like:
> >
> > void (*midi_msg)(LADSPA_Handle instance,
> > unsigned byte msg[4]);
>
> This would be exactly equivalent to the existing run_synth(), would it
> not?
Mmm .. This would replace, I think, all of your considerations on how to
extend LADSPA. It is (probably?) the only extension really needed. MIDI
is a very powerful protcol, and the beuty is that the client needs only
to implement those parts it needs to get going.
For a synthesizer one can ignore start, stop and pause as well as SMPTE,
but for a sequencer or arpeggiator timing would be the name of the game.
As a synthesizer developer I *could*, if I wish so, implement
running-status and thus discover that I have been disconnected, but it
is not required ...
> Chris
>
--=-0F3xhXH6HcrWwCGryMVf--
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat May 01 2004 - 09:11:47 EEST