Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA proposal ...
From: Paul Davis (paul_AT_linuxaudiosystems.com)
Date: Fri May 14 2004 - 21:21:46 EEST
>> stable library interface. I don't know anyone now who *ever* writes X
>> protocol code, and I've never met anyone (except a few people I once
>> knew who worked on a commercial X server, and even that was more than
>> 15 years ago).
>
>This is irrelevant. Xrm has nothing to do with the X protocal, and you can
fons - i wasn't talking about xrm at all. i was referring to the way
that X encapulsates the X protocol in Xlib, and nobody ever deals with
the protocol itself. The protocol is the true definition of X, but
nobody uses it, and with good reason.
>> Its also been a *very* useful approach as JACK has evolved. We have
>> modified the protocol several times without requiring client
>> recompilation.
>
>This is an API, not a file format.
There is a protocol involved in server/client communication. Its
isomorphous to a file format.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri May 14 2004 - 21:22:24 EEST