Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA proposal ...
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Sat May 15 2004 - 00:50:31 EEST
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 11:28:42 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> For example:
>
> (<plugin> stands for the unique name of a plugin)
>
> /<plugin>/addport <name>
> /<plugin>/port/<name>/range 0 10
> /<plugin>/port/<name>/default 5
> /<plugin>/port/<name>/unit octaves
>
> This is a trivial example of course, for a real format we'll have to
> think about grouping, port types, etc.
I dont really see the avantage of this - control and description are
seperate tasks, and not even closely related.
OSC is also not equiped to describe the kind of graph structures you need
to describe plugins - you could arbitrarily extend it, but what not use a
language with native graph structures?
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat May 15 2004 - 00:48:37 EEST