Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA proposal ...

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA proposal ...
From: Joern Nettingsmeier (nettings_AT_folkwang-hochschule.de)
Date: Sat May 15 2004 - 10:23:37 EEST


Jack O'Quin wrote:
> Fons Adriaensen <fons.adriaensen_AT_skynet.be> writes:
>
>
>>On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 11:31:01AM -0500, Jack O'Quin wrote:
<snip>
>>
>>LISP is quite nice actually, but you'd need a complete LISP engine to
>>read it...
>
>
> That wasn't really a serious suggestion. The libguile.so.12.3.0 file
> on my system is over half a meg. Would all the LADSPA hosts be
> willing to add that and whatever else it entails to their memory
> footprint?
>
> Libxml2 is even bigger, almost a meg. I wonder how many LADSPA hosts
> already use it for some other reason? I see that ardour, jamin and
> hydrogen do...
>
> $ ldd `which ardour` | grep xml
> libxml2.so.2 => /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 (0x40297000)

sure, libxml2 is huge, but almost everybody will have it in memory
anyway, since it's used by other programs.

imho, xml *is* very human-readable if the DTD is sane and the output
is pretty-printed. and it's already defined, all the tools are in
place, and changing the DTD is a matter of writing a simple XSLT for
the users to convert their old versions.

so ++xml.

best,

jörn

-- 
Jörn Nettingsmeier
Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Germany
http://spunk.dnsalias.org (my server)
http://www.linuxaudiodev.org (Linux Audio Developers)


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon May 17 2004 - 02:42:39 EEST