Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA proposal ...

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA proposal ...
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Thu May 27 2004 - 03:13:56 EEST


On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 12:41:36 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
> other than that, i'm eager to know how plugin ports are to be
> referenced in the metadata file. by ID or numerical index? if by ID,
> is it the full path to the port: "/SupaPlug/LFO 1/Frequency", or
> something more concise? (i'm for a full path scheme because it
> allows the plugin writer to reorder ports painlessly.)

I think thats an open question, it depends on the metadata language - RDF
has some sequence primatives, but I prefer not to use them.

In lrdf you call the ports <foo>.0, <foo>.1 etc. where <foo> if the URI of
the plugin. It doesnt really matter how you do it.

- Steve


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu May 27 2004 - 03:09:16 EEST