Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA proposal ...
From: Jack O'Quin (joq_AT_io.com)
Date: Thu May 27 2004 - 04:22:17 EEST
Steve Harris <S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk> writes:
> On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 12:41:36 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
> > other than that, i'm eager to know how plugin ports are to be
> > referenced in the metadata file. by ID or numerical index? if by ID,
> > is it the full path to the port: "/SupaPlug/LFO 1/Frequency", or
> > something more concise? (i'm for a full path scheme because it
> > allows the plugin writer to reorder ports painlessly.)
>
> I think thats an open question, it depends on the metadata language - RDF
> has some sequence primatives, but I prefer not to use them.
>
> In lrdf you call the ports <foo>.0, <foo>.1 etc. where <foo> if the URI of
> the plugin. It doesnt really matter how you do it.
How about <foo>/port/0, <foo>/port/1, etc.?
Slashes are a natural separator for forming URI's. The plugin writer
can organize them as desired.
-- joq
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu May 27 2004 - 04:18:51 EEST