Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Is ladspa actually la-dsp-a? Is JACK the ultimate solution?
From: Marek Peteraj (marpet_AT_naex.sk)
Date: Tue Jun 08 2004 - 14:54:58 EEST
On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 11:20, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 01:17:25 +0200, Marek Peteraj wrote:
> > Forgot to add...
> >
> > <snip>
> > > ... infact if you look in many LADSPA plugins you will
> > > see theres really more going on than there appears to be.
> >
> > True that you can't have an ideal isolation of all DSP techniques,
> > whether simple of complex ones. But still, LADSPAs are simple plugins as
> > the name itself suggests.
>
> The API is simple, /not/ the plugins!
>
> I think you're tarring all plugins with my brush. In 2000 I was basicly a
> DSP novice, so all my early plugins are a bit simplistic.
Fons' Moog HP filter is a complex piece of DSP i suspect.
But it's still a HP filter which is a smaller part of a complex synth,
or a complex fx.
Marek
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Jun 08 2004 - 12:41:01 EEST