Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [announce] [patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption Patch
From: Ingo Molnar (mingo_AT_elte.hu)
Date: Sun Jul 11 2004 - 12:50:39 EEST
* Andrew Morton <akpm_AT_osdl.org> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar <mingo_AT_elte.hu> wrote:
> >
> > For all the
> > other 200 might_sleep() points it doesnt matter much.
>
> Sorry, but an additional 100 might_sleep()s is surely excessive for
> debugging purposes, and unneeded for latency purposes: all these sites
> are preemptible anyway.
nono, i mean the existing ones. (it's 116 not 200) There's no plan to
add another 100, you've seen all the ones we found to be necessary for
this.
Ingo
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Jul 11 2004 - 13:00:13 EEST