Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [announce] [patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption Patch
From: Lee Revell (rlrevell_AT_joe-job.com)
Date: Tue Jul 13 2004 - 04:01:16 EEST
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 20:06, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Paul Davis <paul_AT_linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
> >
> > >resierfs: yes, it's a problem. I "fixed" it multiple times in 2.4, but the
> > >fixes ended up breaking the fs in subtle ways and I eventually gave up.
> >
> > andrew, this is really helpful. should we conclude that until some
> > announcement from reiser that they have addressed this, the reiserfs
> > should be avoided on low latency systems?
> >
>
> It seems that way, yes. I do not know how common the holdoffs are in real
> life. It would be interesting if there was a user report that switching
> from reiserfs to ext2/ext3 actually made a difference - this would tell us
> that it is indeed a real-world problem.
>
This was not a synthetic benchmark, I would consider this a 'real-world'
problem now. Repeating the test with ext3 would just tell you whether
it has the same problem.
If it is neccesary to get the reiserfs issue addressed, I will repeat
the test with an ext3 system in the next few days, I would like to hear
from reiser on this before doing much more.
> Note that this info because available because someone set
> /proc/asound/*/*/xrun_debug. We need more people doing that.
> -
This goes back to the need for ALSA documentation. Someone needs to
write some. This will probably require paying that person. Hopefully
SuSe is working on this, though I suspect I would have heard something.
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo_AT_vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Jul 13 2004 - 04:05:22 EEST