Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] ANN: Distributed LADSPA Processing
From: Paul Davis (paul_AT_linuxaudiosystems.com)
Date: Wed Aug 18 2004 - 22:22:23 EEST
> - the system needs every period to be the same size (unless you are not
> running in real-time or the remote load is *very* low, but then what
> is the point?).
thats potentially a bit ugly, but in practice, its probably going to
work, especially with JACK-driven clients/hosts.
> - The system adds to the latency the equivalent of a single period. That
> is, if your period size is 2ms for a total input-to-output latency of
> 4ms, the system adds another 2ms to the latency, so total latency goes
> to 6ms.
does the metaplugin have a control output port called "latency"? this
is an unofficial "standard" that swh (and perhaps the tap) plugins use
to communicate latency to a host. it would allow ardour to keep tracks
in sync that use this kind of processing.
>If jack udp transport doesn't work adequately (haven't tested it), I
>intend to adapt the code to work on top of jack too (should be reasonably
>easy).
jack.rtp is probably a better candidate :)
it all sounds very interesting.
--p
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Aug 18 2004 - 22:26:49 EEST