Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: OSC vs MIDI
From: Artem Baguinski (artm_AT_v2.nl)
Date: Sat Sep 04 2004 - 17:46:17 EEST
Steve Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 10:24:11PM +0200, Artem Baguinski wrote:
>
>>it wasn't maintained since around piksel gathering (nov 2003)... oh, and
>>i'm afraid i have fixed some bugs on artist's offline machine and never
>>brought the sources back to piksel site. the fixes made it compatible
>>with Max/MSP's OSC objects (half of the installation is a max patch
>>running on a mac). if Steve's interested i could find it.
>
>
> Dont worry about it for the moment, but I may get back to you when I add
> bundle support. I think SC uses bundles a lot so you may be stuck there.
right...
>>finally, some of our (http://lab.v2.nl/) artistic hardware speaks OSC
>>over bluetooth, but it's irrelevant coz there's always only one last
>>prototype ;-)
>
>
> OSC over bluetooth is interesting. Any comments on it? How easy is the
> hardware to build? I know you can wire PICs to USB easily, but I dont know
> much about bluetooth.
i'm not involved in any of the projects where we used it. I know that
for one project it was implemented in java on something like java stamp.
Next year my research line is gonna merge with the sensors / wearables /
wireless research of our hardware engineer and i'll be more informed.
> Would it be worth adding a bluetooth transport to liblo?
doesn't liblo support something like "custom pluggable transport"?
that'd be useful for seldom used transports i guess.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Sep 04 2004 - 18:03:44 EEST