Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] impulse convolution LADSPA plugin
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Sun Dec 05 2004 - 03:49:02 EET
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 09:47:54AM +0000, Stefan Turner wrote:
> Hi Steve, thanks for the reply.
>
> I will definitely look into using DSSI, looks like it
> could be good once as supported as LADSPA is (I'd
> never even heard of it before your post, although
> that's probably just me). Is it intended as an
> eventual LADSPA replacement? I never really saw the
> need to divide plugins into 'instruments' and
> 'effects', and it seems like DSSI can do both.
DSSI is a strict superset of LADSPA, so valid LADSPA plugins are valid
DSSI plugins (IIRC).
So it does not replace LADSPA per se. as a pure effect DSSI plugin is a
LADSPA plugin.
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Dec 05 2004 - 03:53:17 EET