Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Patents on some Linux OS code
From: Erik de Castro Lopo (erikd-lad_AT_mega-nerd.com)
Date: Thu Dec 09 2004 - 08:39:50 EET
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 21:47:25 +0100
"Pedro Lozano" <pl2_AT_ono.com> wrote:
> Then I dont understand why there are companies pushing for the aproval of
> software patents in europe and worldwide. To patent stupid things and not
> using these patents for anything?
Look, the patenting of stupid things is to be encouraged as strongly as
possible. The US (and other) patent systems will soon colapse under their
own weight and then be discarded.
Apart from encouraging stupid patents, the best thing you can do is ignore
it completely. When and if you get a cease and desist letter you do the
following:
0) Get the patent holder to provide enough information for you to
figure out if you might infinge or not.
1) If you are out of jurisdiction you may want to disregard the
patent anyway.
2) Get the patent documents and see if the patent can be challenged.
3) If you think it can be challenged, state so publicly in the web
page for the software and tell the patent holder that you will
challenge the patent validity if they try to bring it to court.
4) If it can't be overturned, say sorry to the patent holder and pull
the software for the 2-3 weeks it takes to reimplement the code
working around the patent.
Erik
-- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Erik de Castro Lopo nospam_AT_mega-nerd.com (Yes it's valid) +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Learning Linux is like joining a cult. Sure it's fun at first but you waste time, become brainwashed, and then have to be de-programmed by Bill Gates before you can work for Him again. - Ray Lopez, in UFhK4.33289$y4.1192894_AT_newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Dec 09 2004 - 08:45:20 EET