On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 11:50, David Olofson wrote:
> On Sunday 02 January 2005 18.53, Jan Depner wrote:
> [...]
> > When recording on batteries they will
> > last longer using mp3 recording than WAV recording.
>
> Weird. :-) Disk/flash I/O uses more power than mp3 encoding...?
>
Only with the disk. It has to keep spinning it up.
>
> > One of the nice things about this company is that
> > they have open sourced all of their software and opened the specs
> > for the units. They actually want open source developers on-board
> > (go figure).
>
> Kewl. One should almost get one just for political reasons. ;-)
>
Also the fact that it supports OGG and FLAC.
> (But I could use one anyway, for recording those interesting sounds
> that are too far from my computer to be recorded directly.)
>
That's one of the main reasons I got one. I've got a little
Behringer MX602A to go with it for recording gigs. I used to use a huge
SONY PCM with a VCR and the mixer. It also will record in 48KHz instead
of 44.1KHz.
Jan
Received on Tue Jan 4 00:15:08 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 04 2005 - 00:15:08 EET