On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 03:20:40PM +0100, Mario Lang wrote:
> Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@email-addr-hidden> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 12:02:31 +0100, Mario Lang wrote:
> >> > I'm very interested in the idea of being able to code modules in a
> >> > modular synth live (in realtime) as well.
> >> >
> >> > I was considering using ChucK, given that it's specifically designed for
> >> > RT performance use and can insert/remove/replace pieces of code into the
> >> > vm while running, but it looks like it would be a significant amount of
> >> > work to adapt the ChucK engine to be controlled by another app.
> >>
> >> Have you looked at SuperCollider3? It is designed for RT, allows for live
> >> coding in all sorts of ways (JITLib) and can easily be controlled from
> >> other apps (the client and server side both can send and receive OSC) and
> >> it has 8 JACK in and out ports by default.
> >
> > Yep, for performance coding I would say SC is the best bet, I've seen a
> > live coding performance, and it was very impressive. Almost enough to make
> > me want to use emacs. Almost ;)
> >
> > I was thinking of a live C compiler for prototyping and testing
> > purposes.
>
> CLM (Common Lisp Music) already does that since many years, but its
not sure what you mean by "live", but there is also sfront, which
compiles SAOL to C.
-- Paul Winkler http://www.slinkp.comReceived on Tue Jan 11 20:15:19 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 11 2005 - 20:15:20 EET