On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 01:33 +0200, Florian Schmidt wrote:
> I _heard_ that in the US the algorithm 2 is patented. I haven't really
> looked into it, since my time is limited ATM. If it is not, i might have
> a shot at it at some unspecified time in the future.
If you are talking about Lake DSP, that patent is pretty damn specific.
It's about 20 pages long. I would not expect that an algorithm you can
describe in a sentence or two could necessarily violate it.
Lee
Received on Thu Apr 7 04:15:10 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 07 2005 - 04:15:11 EEST