Jan Depner <eviltwin69@email-addr-hidden> writes:
> On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 12:37, Lee Revell wrote:
>> Personally I think you're wasting your time. Ingo's RT preempt patches
>> let you do hard realtime with Linux using the existing driver base.
> I'm not sure why he's trying to do this because for audio the
> latest patched kernels appear to be more than adequate. That said,
> I don't think you can get a guaranteed 15 microsecond interrupt
> response with anyone's patches to the standard kernel. I wouldn't
> call what we have now hard real-time. More like soft real-time.
> Maybe when MontaVista gets done...
Agreed.
The Linux kernel will always be "soft" realtime. They can never
*guarantee* specific interrupt response latencies, because too much
kernel code can come along later and mess it all up by disabling
interrupts or holding locks.
What many people overlook is that for most practical purposes, soft-RT
is what they really want. Hard-RT is only appropriate for a few
specialized imbedded systems.
Thanks to the hard work of Ingo, Lee and many other folks, recent
Linux kernels provide excellent soft-RT, right out of the box. With
Ingo's RT preempt patches, the results are world-class. There will
always be "two steps forward, one step back" regressions, but those
fixes keep getting migrated into the base kernel, and the general
trend is quite encouraging.
-- joqReceived on Sat Apr 9 00:15:14 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Apr 09 2005 - 00:15:14 EEST