Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Monday 09 May 2005 22:22, Paul Davis wrote:
>>this is massively harder than you think, assuming you want to (a) do
>>it correctly and (b) offer zooming.
>
> Fortunately, if you don't care about doing it correctly or offering
> zooming, it's quite simple.
ROFL. :)
Well, I guess the way it's done in most audio editors is that you draw a
vertical line between the min and max (and maybe also the rms on top of
that), if a single pixel has to represent multiple samples, and the
usual connect-the-points-with-lines thingy (or splines, if you prefer
smooth curves), when zoomed in to the sample or sub-sample level. Is
there a better way?
Albert
-- Dr. Albert Gr"af Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany Email: Dr.Graef@email-addr-hidden-online.de, ag@email-addr-hidden-mainz.de WWW: http://www.musikwissenschaft.uni-mainz.de/~agReceived on Tue May 10 04:15:11 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 10 2005 - 04:15:12 EEST