On Thu, 2005-12-05 at 12:39 -0400, Jesse Chappell wrote:
> Alfons Adriaensen wrote on Thu, 12-May-2005:
>
> > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:40:51AM -0400, Jesse Chappell wrote:
> >
> > > No, i mean the arguments the engine will use in the callbacks
> > > are conventionally specified in the OSC "API" for these comms.
> >
> > Sorry but this still escapes me... Could you give an example ?
>
> OK, check out http://essej.net/sooperlooper/doc_osc.html
> and look at the Get parameters section, and the register for control
> changes section. Sorry for the confusing terminology, it's really
> pretty simple.
FWIW, Om's OSC documentation (in both directions) is also online:
http://www.nongnu.org/om-synth/engine_osc_namespace.html
http://www.nongnu.org/om-synth/client_osc_namespace.html
An OSC note standard would be nice, but I don't know if it's even
possible (it's different for everyone). Service discovery and namespace
enumeration need to just make it a nonexistant problem IMO.
-DR-
Received on Fri May 13 00:15:04 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri May 13 2005 - 00:15:06 EEST