Re: Minimum reasonable latency Was: Re: ZynAddSubFX was: Re: [linux-audio-dev] some new soundfiles on-line

From: Paul Winkler <pw_lists@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat May 14 2005 - 19:56:13 EEST

On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 11:58:45AM +0200, Benno Senoner wrote:
> Plus due to the nature of the sound, low frequency oscillations take
> longer to get recognized since in theory you
> need to hear a full cycle of the wave to "measure" the frequency.
> at 100 Hz it means 10msec ... an eternity for your standards :)

I agree with a lot of what you said, but I don't think this
part is relevant. When we're concerned with latency, it's typically
for rhythmic reasons; pitch is not an issue.

-- 
Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
Received on Sun May 15 00:15:04 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun May 15 2005 - 00:15:06 EEST