Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Minimum reasonable latency

From: Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu May 19 2005 - 18:48:14 EEST

>Lucasfilm's sound processor at 1983 had fixed 1.5 ms latency.

they probably had h/w that processed stuff sample-by-sample, rather
than using block-oriented processing the way that general purpose
computers do it.

if you want to match a sample-by-sample design for day, ProTools TDM
h/w has a 1-3 sample delay, no matter what the DSP load.

--p
Received on Thu May 19 20:15:15 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu May 19 2005 - 20:15:15 EEST