Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Issues

I think that would be a non-standard extension of the current practice and wouldn't be understood by current parsers.

Taybin

-----Original Message-----
From: Jens M Andreasen <jens.andreasen@email-addr-hidden>
Sent: May 25, 2005 3:16 AM
To:
        The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing List <linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden>
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Issues

On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 16:03 +0100, Nick Dowell wrote:
> Good idea.
>
> reverse - domain name type addresses are used quite widely now, in Java
> for example and in all apple's latest stuff.
>
> eg "uk.org.plugin.analogueOsc"
>

Can we have a unique divider between the domain and product?

   foo.bar@email-addr-hidden
and
   foo@email-addr-hidden

.. are in java both represented as

   com.example.bar.foo

Having instead, say

   com.example@email-addr-hidden
and
   com.example.bar@email-addr-hidden

.. would resolve this (minor) issue.

> combined with a version number, you can correctly identify plugins no
> matter their filename..
>
> -n
>
> On 20 May 2005, at 14:19, Steve Harris wrote:
>
> > Or, we could use a system thats been demonstrated to work really
> > well...
> > http://www.w3.org/Addressing/
>

--