Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ot] [rant] gcc, you let me down one time too many

From: Chris Cannam <cannam@email-addr-hidden-day-breakfast.com>
Date: Wed Jun 08 2005 - 23:38:57 EEST

On Wednesday 08 Jun 2005 21:45, eviltwin69@email-addr-hidden wrote:
> then processing speed becomes extremely important. There have been
> some very good points made in this discussion and I will definitely
> investigate some of them. My problem here is that I've heard the
> same type of thing from companies and universities for way too long.

Well, that's the thing. Most of the people in this discussion are
saying true things, and the context is the reason they don't agree.

I write in C++ these days and I particularly like the capability Paul
mentioned of switching containers after the fact. But I've also worked
on high-volume hydrographic and borehole data (although not as high
volume as you're talking about) and much of the best and fastest
software I worked on was in FORTRAN. It was well structured and well
commented, and it was very readable and perfectly good code.

Chris
Received on Thu Jun 9 04:15:13 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 09 2005 - 04:15:14 EEST