>
>
>> thing is though: he does have a point. why is this stuff still so
>> hard, after so many years? its -not- the drivers, imho, its the
>> moving-target nature of ALSA and all the competing audio API's,
>> underneath a pile of semi-working apps ..
>>
>
> the competing APIs is definitely a problem. the OSS guys continue to
> refuse to accept ALSA, and continue to promote the benefits of
> their API
> and libraries. The layers that have been built on top of them
> (PortAudio, JACK, the arts audio api, gnome-sound, etc) continue to
> compete with each other in various ways.
>
> what is happening on linux is similar to the windows world: multiple
> audio APIs each of which serve a different purpose (windows own MM
> api,
> ASIO, GSIF). OS X has a head start here because they forced everyone,
> even the email client writers, to use a callback model for audio I/
> O via
> CoreAudio. if we could do that on linux, the biggest headaches
> could be
> solved quickly. but as you note, we can't.
Maybe hoping that a "darwin like" selection process would keep the
best APIs at the end... something that is not the case on others
systems.
Stephane
Received on Tue Jun 14 00:15:05 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 14 2005 - 00:15:05 EEST