>>Can you quantify how "high-resolution" you need, i.e. what accuracy?
>>The Linux kernel does not have support (yet) for resolution above
>>100Hz or 1000Hz, depending on your hardware platform.
>>
>>There is some work going on into high resolution timers patches, but
>>integration of that is still far off I think.
That sounds like it would be useful for more than just audio, ie
robotics, any embedded linux apps, etc.
> There's actually an active LKML thread about this now, some people want
> to regress HZ to 250. I'm of course violently opposed, but I seem to be
> losing the argument. Please chime in if you care about this.
I would be happy to do so. I'm not familiar with LKML, how would you
suggest I do so? Is it appropriate to subscribe just to place my vote on
that issue?
Thanks
Iain
Received on Wed Jul 13 00:15:16 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 13 2005 - 00:15:17 EEST