On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 18:20 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> > I suppose to make everyone happy this should be runtime configurable.
> > Incorporating which would be quite a task :)
>
> no, to make everyone happy we need the High Res Timer patch. that avoids
> the stupidity of a fixed HZ, which is so early '90s that its
> embarrassing.
Yeah, that point is universally acknowledged. The question is what to
do until that patch is ready to merge.
Lee
Received on Thu Jul 14 04:15:15 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 14 2005 - 04:15:16 EEST