On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 18:20 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> > I suppose to make everyone happy this should be runtime configurable.
> > Incorporating which would be quite a task :)
>
> no, to make everyone happy we need the High Res Timer patch. that avoids
> the stupidity of a fixed HZ, which is so early '90s that its
> embarrassing.
Wow, I did not know what you meant by this, but apparently Windows has
had a dynamic timer tick since at least Windows 98. Embarrassing
indeed.
Lee
Received on Thu Jul 14 20:15:22 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 14 2005 - 20:15:23 EEST