On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 08:58 -0500, Ben Loftis wrote:
> How about a nicer interface to do synchronized I/O ? Currently the docs say,
> in effect: "this is really hard .. just use JACK". I like JACK but there are
> someinstances where it is not needed.
JACK does not add significant overhead. There's really no reason not to
use it.
Lee
Received on Tue Sep 6 20:15:05 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 06 2005 - 20:15:05 EEST