> > The controllers should not send a change back to the M when they are told by
> > the M what their value is.
>
> The whole point about Paul's scheme is that he *is* doing exactly that.
> And while does seem odd, I will not dismiss the idea without giving it
> a full-length meditation :-)
>
> > You'll also want some logic in the M that says "if I receive a change that
> > tells me to go to my current value, then don't send updates to anyone".
>
> This should be a rare occurence, so I wonder if it's worth the extra code.
that was precisely what my code did, though :)
Received on Wed Oct 5 04:15:05 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 05 2005 - 04:15:05 EEST