On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 04:09:04PM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 04:56:04 +0100, Asbjørn Sæbø wrote:
> > Secondly, what would be the better choice, JACK or LADSPA? We are
> > probably going to need som GUI on it, to configure the thing. And we
> > would like to have the flexibility to alter the coding/decoding
> > coefficients, turn on/off some filtering and so on.
>
> A better choice would be DSSI or JACK, LADSPA doesnt really support GUIs.
>
> I wouldn't like to say which will be better, JACK is probably easier, but
> DSSI is more flexible (you can run the plugin as a standale jack app as
> well as a plugin).
OK, thank for the tip. We will look into DSSI also.
Asbjørn
Received on Fri Dec 16 12:15:24 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 16 2005 - 12:15:24 EET