Re: [linux-audio-dev] Interaction bug between zynaddsubfx and muse.

From: Robert Jonsson <rj@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sun Jan 01 2006 - 20:34:14 EET

On Sunday 01 January 2006 19.20, fons adriaensen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 06:42:02PM +0100, Robert Jonsson wrote:
> > Indeed, there are several issues at work here...
> > In anycase, MusE has from 0.7.2pre2 a fix that enables synths with
> > identical names to be used.
> > Also, in the case with ZynAdd, another option is to use only one
> > instance. ZynAdd can have one patch for each midi-channel running. The
> > only drawback is that you cannot apply external effects to individual
> > patches, but ZynAdd has a whole bunch of nice internal effects.
>
> What's probably happening is that recent versions of JACK will if necessary
> modify a client's name to make it unique, while ALSA doens't because IIRC
> it doesn't care about the name but identifies clients by a number that it
> assigns itself.
>
> So if you want unique names (and the same) for audio and midi, you still
> have to provide them on the client's command line. OTOH, sequencers should
> identify midi connections by their client number, not their name.

To my understanding the client number is resolved/assigned at runtime making
it practically useless when mapping sources with destinations. The only
reliable solution is to assign unique names.

Regards,
Robert

>
> AMS should handle multiple patches without requiring a separate instance
> for each.

-- 
http://spamatica.se/musicsite/
Received on Mon Jan 2 00:15:04 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 02 2006 - 00:15:04 EET