Re: [linux-audio-dev] xt2 coming to linux

From: <thockin@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Jan 27 2006 - 20:02:06 EET

On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 06:38:16PM +0100, Florian Schmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:29:51 -0800
> thockin@email-addr-hidden wrote:
>
> > in another thread, Jorgen said that the input/output part of eXT on Linux
> > will be Open Source, so the JACK wizards can JACKify it as soon as it is
> > released.
>
> Why would anyone do this? To generate more revenue for the author? This
> is not really how open source works.
>
> Well, people might do this to help out their fellow users, but for me
> above would leave a bitter taste.

I would do it so that I have a potentially viable alternative to the
current state of affairs, which is that I boot windows to do music.

eXT is a decent program. The reason we don't get commercial apps on Linux
is because no one buys them. Linux folks want everything free.

I am as big a believer in Open Source as anyone else here. But I am also
a pragmatist, and until such time as a viable free alternative exists, I
have to use commercial apps. Given that, would I rather use and support a
commercial app that runs on Windows only or one that runs on Linux, too?

If you can't cope with the idea that someone makes a living doing
software, don't buy eXT, don't help Jorgen, and just ignore it. I, for
one, will do anything I can to help him make Linux into a competitive
migration path for Windows users.

Now, the problem is plugins - VST only? eek.

Tim
Received on Fri Jan 27 20:15:25 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 27 2006 - 20:15:25 EET