On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 16:16 +1100, Loki Davison wrote:
> > do you still object to it's presence even if you don't use or look at
> > it?
> Yeah, i probably still object to it's presence. What is the point of a
> standalone version? What is wrong with just using jack-dssi-host? If
> you want a standalone version, you can just have a script,
> jack-dssi-host myplugin called myplugin for people to run. Though the
> other idea sounds nice. Easy to skin widgets with lots of
> functionality are great. Maybe you can merge them into libphat? It's
> specifically for that purpose, though i don't know Pete's plans for
> it.
Okies. Can't say i understand you objecting to something you don't
have to use but there you go.
why a standalone version, because it's standalone.
no need for jack, jack-dssi-host, an easy to use jack capture program,
or a fully fledged DSSI host sequencer.
just the app, alsa and a keyboard. it lowers the bar for entry into
the world of linux audio.
not everyone is a dyed in the wool, kernel patching, source compling,
terminal using linux wizard.
don't need it?, don't use it ;)
Cheers
Pete.
NB: i'm only working on an interface. i'm not the author of the
standalone app or the (unreleased) DSSI plugin.
Received on Sun Feb 12 08:15:06 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 12 2006 - 08:15:07 EET