Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: No Subject

On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 17:23 -0800, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 16:57 -0800, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
> >> Lee Revell:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 14:08 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> >>>> Who is talking about not paying?
> >>>
> >>> This whole discussion was ignited when someone advocated pirating (or
> >>> stealing, or whatever) commercial software.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Why don't you want to distinct between copyright violation (which is
> >> a gray area, different from country to country) and stealing?
> >>
> >
> > First, because I personally do consider it stealing, and second,
> >
>
> But why do you consider it stealing?
>
>

    I just can't resist this. Please send me a copy of your latest
song, novel, whatever. I'll post it on the internet with my name as
author then we'll come back to this discussion of why Lee and I think
that copyright infringement is stealing. Is this really that difficult
to understand???

-- 
Jan 'Evil Twin' Depner
The Fuzzy Dice
http://myweb.cableone.net/eviltwin69/fuzzy.html
"As we enjoy great advantages from the invention of others, we should be 
glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours, and 
this we should do freely and generously."
Benjamin Franklin, on declining patents offered by the governor of 
Pennsylvania for his "Pennsylvania Fireplace", c. 1744