Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: No Subject

From: Jan Depner <eviltwin69@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Feb 23 2006 - 05:29:47 EET

On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 13:27 +0200, Hannu Savolainen wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
>
> > > > > > Why don't you want to distinct between copyright violation
> > > > > > (which is
> > > > > > a gray area, different from country to country) and stealing?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > First, because I personally do consider it stealing, and second,
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > But why do you consider it stealing?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Because you are taking someone's property without paying them for it.
> >
> > Lets see, taking property. By property, I guess you mean the intellectual
> > property, but isn't what they do exactly, is to copy the intellectual
> > property, not taking it? Because you still have it, perhaps unless someone
> > else claims to be the creator. Well, its just a definition, but I can't agree
> > its stealing.
> Work is work regardless of it's type. You cannot think that you use just a
> copy of someone's work when it's in form of "intellectual property".
> Instead you are using part of the whole work.
>
> Intellectual property is not somathing that drops from the heaven. When
> you use intellectual property somebody has spent maybe years on creating
> it. He expects to get paid for that work. Since the price of a copy cannot
> be too high he would expect to sell certain number of copies (say N). If
> you are using a "copy" of the work you in fact have stolen 1/Nth of
> the time author spent when creating it.
>
> If you run out from barber's shop without paying it's very clearly a
> crime. You have stolen 1/N of barber's monthly salary. Is there anything
> that makes 1/Nth if artist's or programmer's salary less criminal than
> stealing 1/Nth of barber's salary?
>
> If you don't like the model of selling intellectual property then your
> moral right is to refuse using such work. But I don't think you have any
> rights to use the work without paying.
>

    Great analogy! That's it exactly.

-- 
Jan 'Evil Twin' Depner
The Fuzzy Dice
http://myweb.cableone.net/eviltwin69/fuzzy.html
"As we enjoy great advantages from the invention of others, we should be 
glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours, and 
this we should do freely and generously."
Benjamin Franklin, on declining patents offered by the governor of 
Pennsylvania for his "Pennsylvania Fireplace", c. 1744
Received on Sun Feb 26 20:19:43 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 26 2006 - 20:19:43 EET