On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 19:19 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 21:25 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 01:23 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 06:14 +0000, peter wrote:
> > > > i have a question for you though, would you take widespread copyright
> > > > infringement over pervasive DRM (and it's associated outcomes)?
> > > >
> > >
> > > This is a false dichotomy.
> > >
> > > > it's a moot question, we're gonna get DRM.
> > >
> > > I'm not worried - I think DRM will fail in the marketplace.
> > >
> >
> > Damn, Lee, we're agreeing on everything except real-time. This is
> > not normal for us ;-)
> >
>
> I should have said, I think onerous DRM will fail in the marketplace. I
> see no reason why reasonable DRM like Apple's system that lets you
> CHOOSE whether to buy songs from Itunes or fill it with illegal MP3s
> should fail.
>
See. There I go, agreeing with you again ;-)
-- Jan 'Evil Twin' Depner The Fuzzy Dice http://myweb.cableone.net/eviltwin69/fuzzy.html "As we enjoy great advantages from the invention of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours, and this we should do freely and generously." Benjamin Franklin, on declining patents offered by the governor of Pennsylvania for his "Pennsylvania Fireplace", c. 1744Received on Sun Feb 26 20:22:07 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 26 2006 - 20:22:07 EET