On Apr 20, 2006, at 9:05 PM, Paul Winkler wrote:
> OTOH, it's pretty obvious why this is the case. Imagine if it *did*
> have
> to resolve to something. What would that mean? it only works when the
> server's up? (and DNS, and the end user's internet connection, and and
> and...) That would suck so bad.
I wonder why people include the protocol though? Using a java style
reverse DNS would have worked just fine:
org.ladspa.ontology would have made sense too.
Taybin
Received on Fri Apr 21 08:15:05 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 21 2006 - 08:15:05 EEST