Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2 decision points

From: Lars Luthman <larsl@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Apr 22 2006 - 21:19:44 EEST

On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 19:12 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> E) Bundles: no-one screamed when I suggested it, but its a bit different to
> LADSPA 1's /lib directory. Hosts would be required to allow the plugin
> link to libraries in the bundle if they need to (this is why OPENSTEP did
> it, I guess its done by setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH, but I dont know), which
> is a bit more work, but makes moving plugins between machines easier.

I don't really see the point in storing shared libraries in the bundle.
If you are using your own copy of a library already, why not just link
it statically?

I'm not saying that bundles are bad though.

-- 
Lars Luthman
PGP key:     http://www.student.nada.kth.se/~d00-llu/pgp_key.php
Fingerprint: FCA7 C790 19B9 322D EB7A  E1B3 4371 4650 04C7 7E2E

Received on Sun Apr 23 00:15:13 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Apr 23 2006 - 00:15:13 EEST