> I'm going to assume this is a shot at me for rather obvious reasons.
No, I was more thinking in Phil Frost's contribution to this
discussion (contribution that I find very interesting and pertinent,
but as a musician I am not interested in LADSPA becoming another low
level LEGO api to build modular synths, there are already some good
solutions to that problem).
> *sigh* someone just had to do it, didn't they?
GUIs appeared in the thread long before my post.
> LAD_S_PA2 is not going to have GUIs. http://dssi.sf.net. Enjoy.
I am well aware of that. Thanks for the pointer, anyway.
But still there are some parts of LADSPA that have to provide
information for effective (auto)building of GUIs.
> Now can we please have a productive discussion about fixing very real
> problems with LADSPA without /that/ *&%$% topic ruining everything, yet
> again, thanks?
My apologies for bothering you. I will just return silently to my
playground and let the real men do the real stuff.
Peace,
Luis
Received on Sun Apr 23 04:15:07 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Apr 23 2006 - 04:15:08 EEST