On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 11:25:59AM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> But anyway, why can't it go in the code? I want to keep the C part
> minimal as well, but this is a unique identifier, the sole thing that
> actually does belong in the code. I need this to create an app/device
> like the above. What's the better reason it's a bad idea? Plugins have
> a unique string ID, and I need ports to as well.
Theres no advantage to it being in the code, it means allocating an array
of strings, which means repeating the same code in every plugin. Also, you
can't get the strings unless you load and link the plugin, which is one of
the things were trying to get away from.
- Steve
Received on Mon Apr 24 00:51:14 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 24 2006 - 00:51:14 EEST