Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2

On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:55:55 -0400
Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> it takes *way* more lines of code than that to use a ladspa plugin in
> this way, and thats for the existing header-only specification.
>
> one the design goals of a good plugin API is to make life simple for
> plugins, because there are lots of them and presumably quite a few
> authors too, at a certain expense to hosts, because there are relatively
> few of them and their authors are likely to be more skilled at what they
> are doing.
>
> there are lots of little gotchas even with the amazingly simple API that
> LADSPA 1 represents, and quite a few of these will become simpler or
> will vanish with the metadata scheme that steve has outlined.

Erm, just to voice my opinion on this LADSPA 2 thing i kinda hijack your
post to

Vote++;

@Phil: Look at the example plugin. Life does get easier with this.

Flo

-- 
Palimm Palimm!
http://tapas.affenbande.org