Esben Stien wrote:
>> If 192kHz is to high we can always slow it down. 96 or 48 would
>> allow more processing power to be used for other things.
>
> That's in not the concern. You see, it is mathematically not necessary
> to sample at 192kHz. Only reason for doing 96kHz is because of the
Depends on what you are doing. When working on ultrasound it just makes
life easier (no need to do undersampling).
- Jussi
Received on Thu May 4 20:15:05 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu May 04 2006 - 20:15:05 EEST