On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 08:44:25 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> All this doesn't change the fact that the rationale I commented on
> *is* fake, whatever the qualities of LV2 (which I do not even deny).
I dont agree that it's fake per se, but I do think it was overstated. It
can be /difficult/ to maintain binary compatibility, but it is rarely
impossible, unless a really bad design decisision was taken..
- Steve
Received on Tue Jun 20 00:15:10 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 20 2006 - 00:15:10 EEST